The following is a listing of 100! alternative technologies to fossil fuels which have been evaluated by qualified individuals. Panacea will also include in this seciton other sources for devices and further feasibility evaluations from other sources. 

Some of these technologies are at the research and development stage, some can be manufactured immediately.This assessment is, of course, based on a manufacturing view.

Most if not all of these technologies are unkown by the mainstream faculties and general public.

Quote:A New Energy Congress prioritized listing of the very best energy technologies according to ten criteria, including: renewable, environmentally safe, affordable, credible, reliable, developed, and safe (among others). The New Energy Congress is an association for the purpose of reviewing the most promising claims to up-and-coming clean, renewable, affordable, reliable energy technologies, in order to come up with a weighted list of recommendations of the best technologies.-End quote

Please visit this page for the complete comprehensive list.The function of the proposed granted Panacea research and development centre can also serve to help the NEC evaluate and verify these technologies. Plus additionally bring them to the attension of the public and provide faculty conditions.

For an additonal list of technologies related to Free energy which have been disclosed by the mainsteam press please consult this page.

Link

Next is an additional list of technologies. Some of these technologies are at the research and development stage, some can be manufactured Immediately. This assessment is, of course, based on a manufacturing view.  It is interesting to note that the following items with the very highest potential and lowest production costs are not strong contenders as there are no demonstration units available at this point in time, and so they would require a potential manufacturer to have a certain degree of courage to run serious pre-production testing on them.

The order in the fllowing list really depends on the technical background and technical understanding of the people considering them, combined with their immediate objectives and their long-term aims. For a full visual perspective and technical instrucitons on the following please down lad the PDF at teh end of this presentation.

The main objectives are:

1. A device which is fairly easy to manufacture.

2. A device which is easily understood and wanted by the public.

3. A device which can be sold cheaply to a mass market at a good profit.

4. A device likely to require little after-sales servicing.

5. A device which does not create danger for the user.

6. A device whose production cannot be hindered by

 patent considerations  A device which does not require major costs before manufacturing begins.

1. The Wang Shum Ho magnetic motor. 

    Advantages: small, compact, easily understood, suited to household power at a practical level, already demonstrated and under official test, the patent situation apparently dealt with.

    Disadvantages: may be expensive to manufacture, will generate opposition as it completely shatters the illusion of having to burn a fuel to get power, it is not yet certain how long it will be before the magnets need re-magnetising.

2. The Clem Motor.

    Advantages: very simple construction materials, easy to manufacture, no patent problems, readily made in different sizes, provides heating as well as electrical or mechanical power, could produce drinking water, completely self-powered.

    Disadvantages: no demonstration model available and a lathe is needed to make a demo unit, some minor development may be needed before full production, a wire screen will be needed to stop owners burning themselves if they turn the power up too high.

3. The Phi Transformer-style electrical generator.

    Advantages: Very simple construction, low manufacturing costs, very easy to understand, can be made in any size, should be capable of self-powered operation as well as driving serious loads, low-tech system, open source.

    Disadvantages: No demo unit to hand, pre-production model testing would

    be needed.

4. The Isotopic Generator.

    Advantages: Open source, no moving parts, incredibly simple, fairly low-tech device, very readily available materials, it is reported that it works well.

    Disadvantages: No demo device to hand, people think it is too simple to work,needs a 21MHz circuit.

5. The Pulsed Flywheel.

    Advantages: Open source, very easy to understand, simple materials, looks low-tech (although it isn't).

    Disadvantages: No demo unit to hand, physically fairly large, possibility of fair sound levels, large amount of kinetic energy when running and that would cause serious damage were a flywheel to break - so a housing is needed and that could raise noise levels.

6. The Tesla Switch.

    Advantages: Open source, unlimited potential - including running a car, can be any size, self-contained, fairly easy to understand, can be made with no

    moving parts.

    Disadvantages: Needs four batteries, no demo unit to hand, needs to be built and tested before production, the circuitry is somewhat hi-tech.

7. The Coleman / Seddon-Gilliespie Battery.

    Advantages: Open source, incredible potential with 1 kW for 50 years from one tiny tube, very readily connected in banks for greater power, low-tech

    materials, no moving parts.

    Disadvantages: No demo unit to hand, needs pre-production testing.

8. Hydroxy-On-Demand power.

    Advantages: Open source, easily understood, with care it can be self-powered,can use existing commercial engines and electrical generators, heating and welding operations are very attractive.

    Disadvantages: Electrodes need slow conditioning, IC engines have very low levels of efficiency, the gas is dangerous unless most of the oxygen is bled

    off before combustion, engine noise and wear can be significant.

PDF Link.

The following list of additional devices has been done by Tom Beardon.

Link