The Following information is courtesy of Tom Bearden, and is presented here as a technical reference to what Panacea can assimilate at the faculty level in the Panacea proposed granted research center to upgrade the existing university curriculums.


Bearden speaks:Thanks to some highly dedicated and tremendous persons, we have the material hung on our website, , and so we continue to get out the physics of legitimate over unity systems taking their excess energy freely from the vacuum. 


The goal is to save the young scientists and engineers coming on(at least those interested) from having to do 35 years of agonizing research to find out where all the bits and pieces are hidden in physics and thermodynamics (the standard CEM/EE model explicitly forbids such (overunity) systems, since Lorentz arbitrarily symmetrized the Heaviside-Maxwell equations in 1892 and thereby arbitrarily discarded all asymmetric Maxwellian systems – the very ones that are allowed to use excess energy from the vacuum to help power their loads). ( Link )


As pointed out by eminent scientists such as Feynman, Wheeler, and many others, the standard CEM/EE model taught to all our electrical engineers is the biggest piece of scientific junk ever propagated by the scientific community. So we gathered up a listing of all the known falsities in that model, and put the list in a paper, "Errors and Omissions in the CEM/EE Model", and hung it on our website for the young fellows to be able to download freely.


There is not a single EE department, professor, or text that teaches the EM field in massless space, and there never has been one – although all purport to do so. There is not a single EE department, professor, or text that even knows where the energy in the EM circuit comes from, and there never has been one – again, though all purport to teach such. Cranking the shaft of a generator has nothing at all to do with pouring out EM energy onto the conductors and the external circuits to power the loads.


The true cause of the world energy crisis is – and for a century has been – the false teachings of our own scientific community, which continues to propagate such known lies (pointed out by Feynman, Wheeler, and many others) in that sorry old electrical engineering model. We give the references, etc. for the young fellows to go check it out and make up their own minds. Link


Excerpt from Private Correspondence 


Many years ago (I mean WAY back there!), I also met Professor Laithwaite in England – that is how I found out about the Heaviside component of energy flow that had been suppressed. Laithwaite knew about it, and believed gyros could take some energy from that curled component, and he gave me the citations.

I checked them out at RSIC, and there it all was! Laithwaite is dead now, but one of the things he did was to develop a little no-battery, solid state, contraption in which a ball just continuously rolled around, without ceasing. He delivered this demonstration unit to some technical museum in the UK, and when I get a chance I'm going to see if I can find out what happened to it, or more information on it. It definitely is one of the things that also has been very quietly suppressed. End of excerpt 


Simplification: Tom Bearden 

By Leslie R. Pastor


The crux of Tom Bearden's published work, ultimately, is to reveal that the current 'energy' system is and has been deliberately flawed and curtailed preventing the acquisition of using 'free and abundant' sources of energy freely from the 'vacuum of space-time.' Most people presume that 'energy' is 'created' by the power companies and then transferred along a grid line directly into your homes and places of business. Nothing could be further from the truth, and, because it is true, has been deliberately hidden from the general public, academia, and our current electrical engineering schools.

Tom Bearden explains: The real problem is, of all things, the sadly flawed old electrical engineering model. That horrible model used today was put together by Oliver Heaviside and others in the 1880s after James Clerk Maxwell was already dead (in 1879). Today it is actually Heaviside's highly reduced vector equations, further severely reduced by Lorentz in 1892 and in 1900. Most EE's have never even seen Maxwell's actual theory (in quaternion-like mathematics) of 20 equations in 20 unknowns.


 They are lied to and told they are studying "Maxwell's theory", which actually is not taught in any of our universities. [Maxwell's theory is in J. C. Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field," Royal Society Transactions, Vol. CLV, 1865, p 459. Read Dec. 8, 1864. Also in The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 2 vols. bound as one, edited by W. D. Niven, Dover, New York, 1952, Vol. 1, p. 526-597. In this later papers collection, two errata are given on the unnumbered page prior to page 1 of Vol. 


1. In this paper Maxwell presents his seminal theory of electromagnetism, containing 20 equations in 20 unknowns. His general equations of the electromagnetic field are given in Part III, General Equations of the Electromagnetic Field, p. 554-564. On p. 561, he lists his 20 variables. On p. 562, he summarizes the different subjects of the 20 equations, being three equations each for magnetic force, electric currents, electromotive force, electric elasticity, electric resistance, total currents; and one equation each for free electricity and continuity. In the paper, Maxwell adopts the approach of first arriving at the laws of induction and then deducing the mechanical attractions and repulsions.]



The suppression of Nikola Tesla – who, among other things, planned to give free "energy from space" to the world – began in earnest in the 1890s, being directed by some of the most powerful men and organizations on earth at the time. And as J. P. Morgan remarked, "You can't put a meter on that!" (Tesla's free EM energy from space). Thus Tesla had to go. He was fairly easily suppressed by simply cutting down, and then cutting off, his funding. As is known, Tesla did in fact later power an automobile directly with "energy from space". His nephew who rode in the car with him, was still alive the last time I checked.


Any system freely taking and using excess EM "energy from space" to power itself or to produce more power in the loads than the operator himself inputs and pays for, is an asymmetric Maxwellian system a priori. As is known today since 1957, any dipole is a broken symmetry – and that means that "something formerly nonobservable (virtual) becomes observable". Any charge is also a dipole, since it polarizes its surrounding virtual state vacuum with opposite charge. Then it takes (absorbs) virtual state EM energy from that seething virtual state vacuum medium, and re-emits it as real, observable EM energy (real photons) in all directions."


Borrowing work previously done by Lorenz (without the "t"), Lorentz (with the "t") further symmetrized the already sharply curtailed Heaviside vector equations in 1892, thereby arbitrarily discarding all asymmetrical Maxwellian systems. Nature did not and does not discard them. Lorentz did, and all EE departments, professors, and textbooks still blindly discard them to this very day by continuing to teach only the symmetrize Heaviside-Lorentz equations.


So that symmetrization neatly discards all those Maxwellian systems that could be built, and that would freely take excess energy from the vacuum and use it to power or help power the loads. In short, it discards all the COP>1.0 EFTV Maxwellian systems. Our electrical engineers are taught to think, conceive, design, build, and deploy only symmetrical systems that deliberately kill their own source of freely flowing EM energy from the vacuum, faster than they can use a bit of that energy to power the loads.


Think about it: circuits and current flow were deliberately designed to 'kill the flow of energy' period, necessitating, the continuous use of 'power generation' instead of relying upon the actual source of all 'energy.' The truth of the matter is, that, 'energy can neither be created or destroyed,' all that really takes place is the 'change in form of energy.' What the so-called 'power generator' does is to create a 'dipole' (- and +) enabling the flow of energy to commence from its source the 'vacuum of space-time.'


Tom Bearden explains: 


So we have to keep cranking the shaft of the generator – not to power the loads, but to keep restoring the source dipole inside the generator itself. Cranking the generator shaft has nothing to do with furnishing the EM energy flow pouring from the generator terminals and out into space along the conductors of the external circuit. That out-flowing EM energy comes from the broken symmetry of the opposite charges inside the generator – the asymmetry of the source dipole – once the charges are forced apart. The so-called "static" field or potential from any dipolarity is comprised of a steady flow of real photons, whose energy has been directly extracted from the seething virtual state vacuum by the asymmetry of that dipole. Lee and Yang got the Nobel Prize in 1957 for predicting broken symmetry – which was a giant revolution in physics. And, quoting 


Nobelist Lee:


"…the discoveries made in 1957 established not only right-left asymmetry, but also the asymmetry between the positive and negative signs of electric charge." [T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New York, and London, 1981, p. 184].


Think about it: What T. D. Lee discovered was that real 'energy' was asymmetric and thus 'virtual' and therefore nonobservable in form and substance. Energy only becomes symmetric and thus observable in our dimension when it becomes 'observable' as 'charge.' Again, quoting Tom Bearden, " Any charge is also a dipole, since it polarizes its surrounding virtual state vacuum with opposite charge. 


Then it takes (absorbs) virtual state EM energy from that seething virtual state vacuum medium, and re-emits it as real, observable EM energy (real photons) in all directions."


Again, T. D. Lee explains: "Since nonobservables imply symmetry, any discovery of asymmetry must imply some observable. The experiment of Wu, Ambler, Hayward, Hoppes and Hudson… established the asymmetry between the positive and negative signs of electricity." [T. D. Lee, Symmetries, Asymmetries, and the World of Particles, U. Wash. Press, Seattle, 1988, p. 11]. And also clarifies: "…the violation of symmetry arises whenever what was thought to be a non-observable turns out to be [now] actually an observable." [T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New York, and London, 1981, p. 181].


Thus we now know that, the vacuum can indeed be "engineered" to form energy structures and dynamics, by forming those energy structures as dynamic forces in matter, then removing the interacting matter.

In the 50 years since the discovery of broken symmetry and the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang for having predicted this great revolution in physics, the implications of broken symmetry of the source dipolarity inside the electrical power generator has not made it across the university campus from the physics department to the EE department. Most EEs still do not understand the difference between symmetry and asymmetry.


 As Nobelist Lee points out, when you have a broken symmetry you have the case where something virtual has become observable. 


In short, the broken symmetry of the source dipole (separated opposite charges) inside every generator and battery already freely absorbs virtual energy from the seething vacuum, integrates it coherently to quantum level, and remits the energy as real, observable EM energy. So any "source" dipolarity – including any "isolated" charge and its associated vacuum polarization – unceasingly pours out real, usable EM energy in the form of observable photons.And it extracts all that energy directly from its virtual state vacuum interaction. 


All charges and dipoles in the universe do this, and they have done it since their creation some 14 or so billion years ago. Once formed, if the source dipole is left alone and intact, and not destroyed, it will continue to pour out real, free, usable EM energy till the end of time.


The reality is that, there is no "energy" crisis and there never has been. There is an "energy from fuel" crisis because our electrical engineers deliberately use only symmetrical interception and collection circuits that destroy their source dipoles (and their free flow of energy from the vacuum) faster than they use some of it to power the loads. So we have to keep consuming fuel etc., in order to keep restoring the dipole (- and +). There is a fuel crisis hence there is an "energy from fuel" crisis!


That is why we have to keep cranking the shaft of the generator – not to power the grid and the loads, but to keep restoring the source dipolarity (- and +) inside the generator, that the completely inane symmetrical systems built by our EEs continually destroy faster than they power their loads.


Tom Bearden to be continued…….




Tom Bearden









My Own Personal Research Pages




Next is Panacea's proposal to produce a solar net metering plan.